I’m not that bothered with the trilogy since we got it on PS3 in HD before and then you “Cross Buyed” it over for the Vita too. These games go on sale and you’ll probably pick it up when it’s $5. They can’t just look for bugs in hundreds to thousands of games that are created due to emulation issues just so they don’t piss off a few overly vocal members of the community that will buy a PS2 game for $50 but not a digital game for $5-15. The PS3 did great last gen coming in second to exercise toys, and the PS4 was the fastest selling console ever.Ĭorporate programmers aren’t cheap. It can’t be that easy to do.įact is as much as you want backwards compatibility, or claim you do, the PS3 did not suffer greatly as they removed PS2 backwards compatibility, and no backwards compatibility on the 4 didn’t make people avoid it. That would be one heck of a feat to get this hardware to emulate 8 processors running concurrently, from a different architecture, while also dealing with the install data from the discs in a way that makes sense and then they have to figure out if htey want to let you wear out your BD drive faster by having you play a bunch of PS3 games off of it or if they have to create a virtual cd, and reroute things to deal with the install data. PS3 backwards compatibility just isn’t plausible.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |